OLD EUROPEAN WRITING TARTARIA 1(Squared) TABLET DECIPHERMENT
TARTARIA (ON ROMANIAN TERRITORY),WRITTEN CLAY TABLET DECIPHERMENT.
The picture is from: http://www.prehistory.it/ftp/tartaria_tabl..._tablets_14.htm
This tablet is making "a couple with another-one,round,wich is named/nicknamed: "the Sun-tablet".Their estimated and somehow checked age (the round tablet was burned in a furnace after discovery,this way making impossible accurate dating),is somewhere between 4.000 and 5.000 B.C.My opinion (if permited),is that the age is more close to lower margin.
Lycia,on South-West part of Anatolia,with the most worshipped deity Leto was the place of Lycians.Leto and Erebos.The same word “erebos” wich is supposed to be by some scientists at the very base of the name: Europe.
/The folowing map is from ALFABETOS DE AYER Y DE HOY,http://www.proel.org/alfabetos/tartaria.html In my paper on the round tablet am evidencing that there is a "continuum" between ages and civilisations.The words/concepts for the Sun,work,working tools,braking,ancients,double-headed-axe,ruller,power,writing,cross,are related;their representatives are the folowing old words: LAUBURUS,LABAR,LABRYS,ARBIL/ARB-ILLU,TUB-la/Tablet,LABYRINTHOS,EREBOS,UEREBOS SU,REBUS and finaly the now-days spanish ,greek and Maltese words LABRA,LAVRA and HABRA are close-related.It is a relation between the ground,earth-eners and the Sky/Universe/deities through work ,imagination and hope.It is about a steadiness of human-kind to have a better life on the ground in their life,and above,in the after-life.It seems that the place of origin of initial people is in the place between where sumero-tamils and ancient iranians lived;between Near-East and Central Asia.In time,a part of them migrated west;or dispesed from Thracia/Ukraine !?
With their northeners Lycaonians,Lycians got life to L-a/e-T- i/o -ns;Latins/Letons "the old latins" as romanian schollar name it ; it seems that their branch got west into Europe,and diverged on the actual territory of Romania:one part gone to the Baltics,another to Italy ; the rest, remained,( but most of those remained ,still migrated westward in Europe).They were the Old Europeans.Their language was changing from say:"hittite-Lycian",in the corse of time to:Danubian=Proto Celtic,(more exactly "Q"subdivision,out of twoo:Q and P).Or the scenario was like that:the Indo-Europeans entered from North-East part of Europe;say Volga/Ukraine to the Baltics and Eastern-Europe;from this last part they entered Anatolia.
The Phaistos Disk: A Statistical
Decipherment.CONSEQUENCES OF THE PROTO-IONIC DECIPHERMENT
By J. Faucounau From: http://www.anistor.co.hol.gr/english/enback/v002.htm
"….Kretschmer distinguished three linguistic layers in the European languages : a)- Pre-Indoeuropean b)-" Proto-Indoeuropean" (Proto-IE) c)-"Indoeuropean (IE) stricto sensu". This linguistical division was roughly corresponding to three periods : a)- Paleolithic (with late remnants like Basque, Hurrian and some Caucasic languages, impossible to classify) b)- Neolithic (with "proto-Ie" languages, like Lycian, Etruscan and the hypothetical "Pelasgic") c)- Early Bronze Age, with an expansion from 3000 BCE on, of the Indoeuropean languages, like Greek, Sanskrit or Celtic. "
"…Kretschmerian frame : c.3000 BCE, the "first Greeks", the Proto-Ionians, came by sea from the Danubian Delta and settled at Troy, then a few centuries after in the Cycladic Islands and on some coastal places in Greece (Attica and Euboea, in particular). The "cultural unity" noticed during the Early Bronze Age is explained by the Proto-Ionian influence in the Aegean at that time. A cultural unity, which cannot mask, nevertheless, some strong differences between Minoan Crete, Continental Greece, Cyclades and coastal Anatolia at the beginning of the Bronze Age.
The Anatolian map is from:http://www.proel.org/alfabetos/licio.html From: http://www.anistor.co.hol.gr/english/enback/v011.htm :
PROGRESS TOWARDS THE RECOGNITION OF THE MINOAN LANGUAGE
<<...reading shows a language which seems to be both "Pre-Indoeuropean" and "Proto-Greek". We mean that a)- on one hand, it appears as agglutinative, using "particles" like for instance a -NE particle, identical to the "attributive particle" (or "definite article") of the Hurrian language (See Speiser (7) p. 98 and ss) b)- on the other hand, its vocabulary has been passed over in Greek, where those words or roots have NO clear IE-etymology, e.g. Greek AMAFW : "to harvest".>>
As I said before,my experimental previous alphabet,nearly matched the later found "Lycian" alphabet from wich (in a strange unknown way), most of the signs on the tablet are coming.
The folowing table is from: http://www.proel.org/alfabetos/licio.html
That's why the words and the language cannot be in a pure state from Lycian language;they allready begun to change,toward what I evidenced above.
My big question mark is this :Those Lycians,Lydians,Phrygians ond other people are a migration from a previous sumero-akkadian stock from Eastern-Europe towards Anatolia,or was a single-way migration from Near-East towards Europe!?Because I detected an strong sumero-tamil substrate;if not so,at least an akkadian-one.Both effects were detected by me,nd I can proove this,with arguments mostly from the linguistics field.
This is the written "squared" tablet.,wich some scientists are assocating with the round tablet.Italian professor Merlini,put a big amount f time and effort to elucidate as many aspects related to thoose tablets,as his time and possibilities permited.He made an site where his conclusions are displayed.He evidenced that these twoo tablets are "brother and sister",ment to be worn on the same string,one upon another.Here we are discussing of the "more squared" tablet.It's picture is named :Tablita/tablet 01.
These twoo tablets are using different alphabets:the round-one is using an alphabet close to "classical" phoenician;those squared is using an Lycian alphabet;but the meaning of the texts is related;one tablet,(the round-one),is telling about both and of the reading procedure;it seems like twoo branches of the same people ,after the time passed were having close contacts and comunicated between;suppose that a civilisation have a remote colony.In the corse of time this liaison dissolute,and the colony was absorbet by the native population or the mixture of other many populations in the area.
On the tablet are drawn lines,as to make "houses" on the tablet's surface.Each "house" it's containing generaly, "clousters" of simbols/letters.I named/gave a number, each of those "houses" and coresponding "clousters" (of corse,with the same number). The letters on it are mostly from lycian alphabet .When I used the lycian alphabet ,I found that one sign is remaining out,perhaps is from somwhere other place. One or twoo signs/letters are from related alphabets ,in the vicinity of Lycia,in the Anatolian area,eg. carian).The general rule is:the reading are from upside to dawn,begining from the left side of the tablet.
This immage is from: http://www.proel.org/alfabetos/tartaria.htm
LETTERS: 1.:E,G, 2.:He?,He?,G?, 3.W(V,E?) ;Ya(D?),G
Text: (E?);EGW/EGHW ,(EG?); 2.HA 3.YaG (WED?);(DAG?)
Translation:I believe/sit (thrust?) strong (burn?) ;(dag)
1,2: E(lydian):"to be"; egh'om(PIE):"I,me" ;egw(gr.):"I";[eg(thrac.):"bright"]; uk(hitt.,carian):"I,me"; EG(OCS):"burn" YAG(tr. ):"strong" ;2.: HA(hitt. )="believe" ;aha(lycian):"to sit"; 3.*WEDh(PIE ):"to thrust,to beat"
kara (also yag~IZ) also denoted "strong" and "common people" == (or lesser aristocracy; they depend on ... (from: http://www.forum-one.org/new-1871149-4338.html )
PIE *wedh - 'lead';
Lithuanian :vedù 'I lead' ;Old Irish :fedid 'leads'
B. (middle);LETTERS:upside,Left to Right:1.:G 2.Ka(T?) downside,L to R: 3.:e,Q (eTe?) 4.:M,U
Text: 1,3: GETE? ; 1,3:GEQKa(i)M ; 2,4:Geqka MU Translation:"GETES;of GAT/my GAT":
Amu(lydian):"I,me"; Geq(albanians "GEG"?;geg/alb.:"eagle");Geqqaim,geqqayou:"the 2 suffixed forms of GAT"(GAT is the place of Hebron-city,the dwelling of old people name Anakim;their old father was named "Arba",from wich the city was named before,"Kiriath-Arba";they werenear etincted by hebrew tribes,only a few remained in life)
Letters: (rigt side): 1.P,I,Kh(X) 2.YO
Text: Pai'k/Pai ke -Yo; (LIIKhIo?=lycian?); (khyo/kathmandu:"rice,sprinkle,fields-khyos:of the fields)
"GIVE AND BE GIVEN";( LYCIAN?OF THE FIELDS?)
pai,pija(hitt.)="to give" ; (lycian:pije,pibije) ;slavic,po,lith:pa:"on.upon"; -YO(lat.):suffix,:"be" (The same way as:
COMPARATIVE GRAMMAR OF LATIN http://ling.cornell.edu/Weiss/CGL_29_Present_Stem_Class_.pdf
The Present Stem Classes
I. Latin has four and a half present stem classes in the traditional set up and a small number of
2. Factitives from adjective: novus —> novare. (sanare etc.)
a. In PIE terms there appears to have been a factitive suffix -¤ which made verbs of the
meaning 'make X.' In Hittite the cognates of these verbs follow the -ßi conjugation
E. The Third and Fourth Conjugations. This is the main repository of present stem formations
inherited from PIE
5. -ye/o- presents could be either deverbal or denominal.
a. In particular, these were often used to form medium tantum presents like *mfl-ye-tor
'thinks > Grk. ma¤nomai 'is mad' = Ved. mányate = Latin re-minî-sc-or.
b. But were also found in active presents like *kap-ye-ti 'takes.’
c. Denominal fîni-yô > fîniô 'finish from fînis 'end,’ serviô < href="mailto:firstname.lastname@example.org" target="_new">email@example.com